Summer Transfer Window 2026
-
UnsyisaRhino
- Posts: 991
- Karma: 668
-
sam of the south
- Posts: 2831
- Karma: 2364
-
Kerryblueboy
- Posts: 3248
- Karma: 986
Re: Summer Transfer Window 2026
Two birds one stone! Joking (sort of)
I doubt we'd sell Garner and don't think the club from a PR perspective would sell him to anyone but someone like United or Arsenal or Chelsea and the like. With Gueye going then it would leave us needing to replace a big part of the team which I have little faith in us achieving.
I don't think Garner is irreplaceable though and £80m from Forest/Newcastle where we can then pay the £25m for Hackney wouldn't be the worst thing.
At the same time, Garner continues playing the way he is then we'll get big bucks for him next season if we want to sell, so I guess it's no rush or anything and maybe better to keep.
I doubt we'd sell Garner and don't think the club from a PR perspective would sell him to anyone but someone like United or Arsenal or Chelsea and the like. With Gueye going then it would leave us needing to replace a big part of the team which I have little faith in us achieving.
I don't think Garner is irreplaceable though and £80m from Forest/Newcastle where we can then pay the £25m for Hackney wouldn't be the worst thing.
At the same time, Garner continues playing the way he is then we'll get big bucks for him next season if we want to sell, so I guess it's no rush or anything and maybe better to keep.
-
Kerryblueboy
- Posts: 3248
- Karma: 986
Re: Summer Transfer Window 2026
It would be madness to turn down anything 50 million or over for garner he is a good prem midfielder but easily replaced imo that kind of money could be used to reshape the squad
Re: Summer Transfer Window 2026
(Source - @matte.moretto )
-
Cereal Killer
- Posts: 3793
- Karma: 1351
Re: Summer Transfer Window 2026
Give him the same number as Gana so everyone can keep their named shirts
- Lazarou II
- Posts: 2009
- Karma: 1084
-
sam of the south
- Posts: 2831
- Karma: 2364
Re: Summer Transfer Window 2026
Dm, 27, would cost an absolute packet (although probably less than we’d get for James Garner, bizarrely)