Accounts Released (23/24)

[superpull]

https://www.evertonfc.com/news/2025/mar ... ublishes-/

Headlines are a £14.7m increase in turnover to £186.9m, and posting a loss of £53.2m (down from £89.1m in 2022/23)

[superpull]

Lost £53.2m despite a £48.5m profit generated from player trading activities.

None of this is massively pertinent to FFP - as we have to assume things like the stadium are now properly accounted for and exempt from P&S rules.

[Cereal Killer]

£53m loss including £313m spent on the stadium?? So really £260m up if we weren’t building it?

[Bluebridge]

Lost £53.2m despite a £48.5m profit generated from player trading activities.

None of this is massively pertinent to FFP - as we have to assume things like the stadium are now properly accounted for and exempt from P&S rules.

That’s good considering how much we’ve spunked away on loans etc.

[emblue33]

Wow ..................money ,money money !!!!!!!

how much was that last euromillions jackpot 200 pls and just one winner in euro land not uk

daft question time how much has Moyes got or could get to spend on new players

[weimaranerblues]

Where as Chelsea report £128.4m profit after sale of women's team , cheeky fuckers at it sgain

[The Doc]

Where as Chelsea report £128.4m profit after sale of women's team , cheeky fuckers at it sgain

Seems legit.

Had no idea a women's team was worth that much, without sounding misogynistic, I have no idea of the revenue it generates.

As a side note from the obvious book cooking.

[Cods]

I mean, what kind of club ownership sells off its women's team?

[AjaxAndy]

Does anyone know how long it usually takes before these accounts are analysed and someone tells us roughly where this leaves us with PSR?

[superpull]

I mean, what kind of club ownership sells off its women's team?

They've sold it to themselves though, still owned by the same people who own the men's I believe.
Problem with asset stripping though, is you run out of assets eventually. The changes to P&S can't come soon enough for Chelsea

Does anyone know how long it usually takes before these accounts are analysed and someone tells us roughly where this leaves us with PSR?

After the fiasco of being punished twice in the same season, the Premier League changed it's fabricated rules and decided it's new rule was that they promise to review and punish in the same season the accounts are released.

[Cods]

They've sold it to themselves though, still owned by the same people who own the men's I believe.
Problem with asset stripping though, is you run out of assets eventually. The changes to P&S can't come soon enough for Chelsea



After the fiasco of being punished twice in the same season, the Premier League changed it's fabricated rules and decided it's new rule was that they promise to review and punish in the same season the accounts are released.

Should have phrased it differently...

what kind of club views, nay sport allows, its women's team as an asset and uses it as a tool to effectively rig finances.

I mean the players are used to being treated as assets individually, but the buying and selling to essentially give the men's team more advantage, on paper at least, is just not football, not sport. Hate it.

[brap2]

Swiss ramble thread

[Cods]

The top end are so protected.

That this PSR figure is a fixed static number, exclusive of indexation, the big clubs differential between marginal buying and selling has the potential to make big profits, yet the clubs selling players say under 10m just have so little room to really improve. They have to sell a number of huge improvers for much more than they bought them for just to move the needle in a small way. The economy of scale disproportionally favours the big clubs.

"Despite the improvement, Everton’s £53m pre-tax loss was still one of the largest in the Premier League with only four clubs doing worse last season, namely Manchester United £131m, Aston Villa £86m, Bournemouth £66m and Liverpool £57m."

Hmmm....

[Trowel]

Any player sales up to the end of June will be an interesting indicator for PSR, given Onana is the only sale on the 24/25 books currently, with Ndiaye and O'Brien coming in. After that the shackles should be loosened a touch.

[Cantoffee]

Depends on where we finish but if we can finish where we are now I'd suspect that loss will be closer to £35m in the current year (year end buy/sell depending of course).

I am curious about how much revenue and net revenue will increase with the move to BMD. Increased gate receipts, improved corporate matchday revenue, naming rights as well should all add a potential £30m or so a season in top line revenue. Not sure how much of that flows to the bottom line but would assume a good chunk will.

No matter what though we will remain a sell to buy club over the long run. Everyone is now except those absolute top clubs.