Re: Christian Nørgaard
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2026 5:46 am
Already has...
Paul Power; Gareth Barry
Paul Power; Gareth Barry
The new start for the NSNO Everton forums
https://nsno.co.uk/
I’m not at all adverse to the signing. He’s a good player and there’s not really a conversation to be had in terms of him versus Tim. Every single transfer we make can’t be buy young with potential. The only issue is Norgaard will give us 2 years with no sell on and in the meantime we haven’t developed somebody to come in and replace him. I suppose I’ll have to accept again that this will take a bit more time and maybe a different manager.Cods wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2026 10:15 pm The average age of the 10 signings (if this goes through) since Moyes took over again, is now 23.
Gana out and Nørgaard in reduces the overall squad age.
If we have Nørgaard Hackney Garner Röhl, and KDH fighting for central spots then we can cope with injury.
It seems pretty evident that Armstrong needs another loan and maybe Charlie will be sold, and Tim, whilst he has some exceptional skills and has shown solid improvement, perhaps isn't good enough overall.
I've no problem with a bit of experience for some of the younger ones to play with, or transition into the team. It provides us the safety in case its too early to blood the younger ones for 40+games, but also the opportunity to keep playing the kids if they do well and can handle it.
Yet last year we still had one if the highest average starting 11s, alongside Fulham and Villa. If that doesn't tell people there is a disconnect between the manager and committee then nothing does
In terms of development it's probably better for our young players than signing a 25 year old.Big Nevs Vaz wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:17 am I’m not at all adverse to the signing. He’s a good player and there’s not really a conversation to be had in terms of him versus Tim. Every single transfer we make can’t be buy young with potential. The only issue is Norgaard will give us 2 years with no sell on and in the meantime we haven’t developed somebody to come in and replace him. I suppose I’ll have to accept again that this will take a bit more time and maybe a different manager.
I'm not sure we can 'open up' yet and spend big until the finances (revenues) grow to a more sizeable amount.Big Nevs Vaz wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:17 am I’m not at all adverse to the signing. He’s a good player and there’s not really a conversation to be had in terms of him versus Tim. Every single transfer we make can’t be buy young with potential. The only issue is Norgaard will give us 2 years with no sell on and in the meantime we haven’t developed somebody to come in and replace him. I suppose I’ll have to accept again that this will take a bit more time and maybe a different manager.