Page 19 of 24

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 2:29 pm
by Toddacelli
brap2 wrote: Wed Oct 08, 2025 11:38 am "HD the best atmosphere I've played in"

Why lie?
You’re not seriously arguing with those ears are you? The man’s got the best acoustic equipment in the Prem!

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:04 pm
by Bob Sacamano
Oh joy

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:45 pm
by Escalator
Well deserved

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:49 pm
by Escalator
brap2 wrote: Wed Oct 08, 2025 11:38 am "HD the best atmosphere I've played in"

Why lie?
It’s his to judge

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 5:46 pm
by Bluebridge
Toddacelli wrote: Wed Oct 08, 2025 2:29 pm You’re not seriously arguing with those ears are you? The man’s got the best acoustic equipment in the Prem!
🤣

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 3:45 pm
by blueToffee
Shogun wrote: Wed Oct 08, 2025 1:36 pm He's fine. Good senior pro and generally dependable.

Wonder what sort of player he'd be if he'd stayed at Brentford rather than played Dyche-ball for years.
Yeah, was listening to a football podcast the other day and I don't remember the context but they mentioned some stat when at Brentford he was the highest % dribbler from the back of all the clubs in the Championship for two seasons. Then he moved to Burnley and kinda got the label of a meat and potatoes defender in that Dyche system and probably got a bit of lack of respect because of that.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2025 2:41 pm
by kramer
Dyche had him playing midfield a bit before he solidified his spot in defense.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:11 pm
by Shogun
Got no time for this. Nasty behaviour and should have been sent off.


Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:16 pm
by Cods
Shogun wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:11 pm Got no time for this. Nasty behaviour and should have been sent off.

Yeah you can't be doing that. Haven't seen the full game yet, was it a yellow?

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:40 pm
by Bob Sacamano
He’s an absolute yard dog. Can’t be arsed with him and can’t wait to have proper CBs playing for us.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:42 pm
by Audrey Horne
O'Brien and Branthwaite 😍

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:43 pm
by blueToffee
Shogun wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:11 pm Got no time for this. Nasty behaviour and should have been sent off.

Was pretty surprised they took no action there. Not really much media outcry either, which is also fairly surprising as usually we're in the sweet spot for pundits to get on their high horse with any infractions.

Crazily it almost seems like the difference is purely the way he was facing. I think if he went into him from the front and the player goes down clutching his face etc he'd have gone. It's almost like they were like WTF was that.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 10:07 pm
by Robioto
I walked out of the room in a strop calling Tarkovski every name under the sun as soon as I saw it, went to make a cup of tea expecting to see us down to 10 when I came back. It was a clear red IMO. Thankfully the refereeing and VAR were as inept as usual.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 10:52 pm
by Risky
Yeah, not a great look when your captain is doing braindead shit like that. Feels like he's regressed massively this season and maybe he's feeling it too and is frustrated. I mean he's always been a shithouse, but normally at least slightly less blatant and pointless than that.

Re: James Tarkowski

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2025 12:14 am
by Jamokachi
No idea how he didn't get a red. Far more 'violent conduct' than the Gana incident.