End of Moshiri - Friedkin, APPROVAL AGREED

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1826
Karma: 1866

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Cozzie wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:29 pm This is gonna go nuclear levels of bad isn't it?
Trying not to agree with you and AudreyHorne but this is giving me the horrors.
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4826
Karma: 2194

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Seems like every club that gets a rich benefactor gets a shitty dodgy bastard first.

I'm just hoping if this goes through they're our frog that leads to a prince without too much damage being done first.
.
Shogun
User avatar
Posts: 11433
Karma: 8486

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

I mean, after the Moshiri years then you basically just want somebody fairly pragmatic who knows what they're doing and isn't going to send us into financial ruin. You can't say these guys convince on that front.
The Doc
Posts: 1362
Karma: 889

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Can't see this ending well like.

We can't catch a break. The most tainted fans in Europe.
Bluebridge
Posts: 1606
Karma: 883

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

At least there’ll be no false hope with these guys.
Blueomar
User avatar
Posts: 2103
Location: Half Moon Bay, California, USA
Karma: 850

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:15 pm Seems like every club that gets a rich benefactor gets a shitty dodgy bastard first.

.
Don't we have that now?
MayorFarnham
User avatar
Posts: 781
Karma: 399

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:15 pm Seems like every club that gets a rich benefactor gets a shitty dodgy bastard first.

I'm just hoping if this goes through they're our frog that leads to a prince without too much damage being done first.
.
My impression is it's a succession of dodgy bastards, each more dodgy than the last. Sunderland, Leeds, Blackburn, Bolton Portsmouth......
74Blue
Posts: 591
Karma: 346

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:15 pm Seems like every club that gets a rich benefactor gets a shitty dodgy bastard first.

I'm just hoping if this goes through they're our frog that leads to a prince without too much damage being done first.
.
How do you think all of these mega-rich benefactors get their billions? Hate to break it to you, but squeaky clean mega-rich benefactors simply do not exist. Every single one of them is a shady fucker. It's all of the super-shady dealings that makes them so rich in the first place.

Mega-rich benefactors who chuck billions at football clubs are simply using the business as a vehicle to launder their dirty cash.

You've got Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney at Wrexham. Yes, they've earned big money from acting, which is fine whilst you're plodding away in the lower leagues. However, to compete at the very top of the Premier League, you have to be the sort of rich that you only become by being one fucking dodgy bastard.
Escalator
Posts: 3127
Karma: 1035

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Think Jim Ratcliffe is a decent bloke, can’t see anything dodgy about him ?
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4826
Karma: 2194

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

74Blue wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:13 am How do you think all of these mega-rich benefactors get their billions? Hate to break it to you, but squeaky clean mega-rich benefactors simply do not exist. Every single one of them is a shady fucker. It's all of the super-shady dealings that makes them so rich in the first place.

Mega-rich benefactors who chuck billions at football clubs are simply using the business as a vehicle to launder their dirty cash.

You've got Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney at Wrexham. Yes, they've earned big money from acting, which is fine whilst you're plodding away in the lower leagues. However, to compete at the very top of the Premier League, you have to be the sort of rich that you only become by being one fucking dodgy bastard.
Yeah I've said the same before on here so completely agree, but the point is more Newcastle had Ashley and that was destructive to the club, they then got the Saudis who are obviously horrific but they will grow the club.

Pretty sure Man City were similar before they got their current owners. Villa likewise.

So really it's not that the prince is a wonderful human who made billions supporting human rights and deprived children... They'll be awful people, but they're not the plunder and strip the club of all it's assets types, they want to grow the club even if their intentions aren't honourable.
brap2
Posts: 4376
Karma: 4095

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 9:51 am Yeah I've said the same before on here so completely agree, but the point is more Newcastle had Ashley and that was destructive to the club, they then got the Saudis who are obviously horrific but they will grow the club.

Pretty sure Man City were similar before they got their current owners. Villa likewise.

So really it's not that the prince is a wonderful human who made billions supporting human rights and deprived children... They'll be awful people, but they're not the plunder and strip the club of all it's assets types, they want to grow the club even if their intentions aren't honourable.
But why would you think that's anything but a coincidence?

I think it's probably survivor bias. You can recall the club's who eventually got 'good owners' rather than the succession of club's who cycled through shite owners and either treaded water, or even died.
777Kidnappings
Posts: 3016
Karma: 1687

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:15 pm Seems like every club that gets a rich benefactor gets a shitty dodgy bastard first.

I'm just hoping if this goes through they're our frog that leads to a prince without too much damage being done first.
.

We've had Johnson kenwright and moshiri. It's been all frogs
Sirblue57
Posts: 340
Location: Torrevieja
Karma: 71

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Think frogs would gave done a better job tbh.
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1826
Karma: 1866

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

Sirblue57 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:01 pm Think frogs would gave done a better job tbh.
Hop it!
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4826
Karma: 2194

Re: 777 Partners Takeover

Post

brap2 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:14 am But why would you think that's anything but a coincidence?

I think it's probably survivor bias. You can recall the club's who eventually got 'good owners' rather than the succession of club's who cycled through shite owners and either treaded water, or even died.
New stadium, hopefully a team in profit or breaking even... Those two things will see us be much more appealing to a buyer whose looking to sports wash a nations wealth (not that such an owner would sit well with me).

Newcastle were bought because the team was in profit allowing for spending without breaching FFP.

777 will be here to make a profit when they sell in a few years, we just need to ride that out and hope the club isn't destroyed by the time the next owner comes in, and that the new owners are using us for a different reason that is mutually beneficial.
Locked Previous topicNext topic