The NSNO Everton Forums

Don’t both of these graphs basically illustrate what I’ve said about him?

Quality off the ball
Anonymous on it

Anonymous a bit harsh tbf he’s good he’s just not actually good

brap2 wrote: ↑Thu May 14, 2026 8:39 am Anonymous a bit harsh tbf he’s good he’s just not actually good

You at it again ffs

How many 6s are amazing on the ball in terms of forward play?

He's a defensive stat monster, reads the game great and moves the ball around well.

I think an upgrade on that costs you £70m+

I think our issues stem elsewhere not with Garner. Whomever we play alongside him tends not to be a good forward passer, and the full backs offer nothing.

Then our wingers aren't pacy.

So we can neither pass through a team, nor hit them quickly in transition.

Replacing Garner wouldn't rectify those issues.

CraigS... wrote: ↑Thu May 14, 2026 9:18 am You at it again ffs

I’ve no idea what you’re talking about, have we spoken before?

Pretty much the same players as Elliot Anderson based on those graphs then.

Stick a ball playing midfielder next to him and we might be able to work on something.

Couldn’t care less about a player like garner playing through balls.

Nice if he does, doesn’t matter if he doesn’t.

Yeah every team needs water carrying workhorses

brap2 wrote: ↑Thu May 14, 2026 11:29 am Yeah every team needs water carrying workhorses

City are about to pay over £100m for the Forest one apparently!

Shogun wrote: ↑Thu May 14, 2026 11:42 am City are about to pay over £100m for the Forest one apparently!

Money well spent