Page 69 of 72
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 8:06 am
by brap2
Cods wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2026 11:20 pm
Wasn't one of Garners better games but he 'won' on almost every metric, except clearances and ball recoveries.
Wharton had more of the ball mainly because Palace had 60% of it, but he missed the target with both his shots, missed 5/6 tackles, 3/3 aerial duels, and was dribbled past 5 times to Garner's 1 (and Iroegbunam's 0).
No interceptions relative to Garner, fewer key passes/chances created.
Think Wharton just ran around with the ball a lot, and when he didn't have it he didn't do a great deal.
Sounds important, we must have battered them?
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 8:30 am
by Matt1878
Fishing for attention. Disapointing.
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 8:58 am
by brap2
Matt1878 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2026 8:30 am
Fishing for attention. Disapointing.
There is a conversation started by Ajax Andy above.
Are you here to contribute?
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 9:22 am
by Gash
brap2 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2026 8:58 am
There is a conversation started by Ajax Andy above.
Are you here to contribute?
I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 9:43 am
by brap2
Gash wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2026 9:22 am
I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.
Jesus I think I should log out
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 11:19 am
by AjaxAndy
Gash wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2026 9:22 am
I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.
Either way Brap's chatting his usual codswallop
Re: James Garner
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 12:50 pm
by Cods
AjaxAndy wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2026 11:19 am
Either way Brap's chatting his usual codswallop
Oi!
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 8:58 pm
by brap2
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:01 pm
by Shogun
At least we didn't spend £120m on him!
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:02 pm
by AjaxAndy
brap2 wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2026 8:58 pm
Is he in there? I zoomed and couldn't see him anywhere? It's such a jumble of names.
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:03 pm
by Cozzie
Proves the Dwight Mcniel comparisons to Harry Wilson where spot on.
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:04 pm
by Cozzie
AjaxAndy wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2026 9:02 pm
Is he in there? I zoomed and couldn't see him anywhere? It's such a jumble of names.
Don't think he is which I believe is the point braps making.
If you squint you can see both Grealish and McNeil in there.
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:07 pm
by brap2
He’s just above the 40 passes p90 x 0.5 through balls.
Making no points, I’m sure they would be dismissed anyway!
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:09 pm
by Cozzie
Oh aye.
He's right by Gana Gueye, on this and on the pitch!
Re: James Garner
Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 9:17 pm
by Cods
So similar amount of through balls per 90 as Caicedo, Rice, Rodri, Szoboszlai, Gibbs White, Bernardo Silva, Alex Scott, Xhaka....
I see where you're going with this.
