James Garner

[brap2]

Wasn't one of Garners better games but he 'won' on almost every metric, except clearances and ball recoveries.

Wharton had more of the ball mainly because Palace had 60% of it, but he missed the target with both his shots, missed 5/6 tackles, 3/3 aerial duels, and was dribbled past 5 times to Garner's 1 (and Iroegbunam's 0).

No interceptions relative to Garner, fewer key passes/chances created.

Think Wharton just ran around with the ball a lot, and when he didn't have it he didn't do a great deal.

Sounds important, we must have battered them?

[Matt1878]

Fishing for attention. Disapointing.

[brap2]

Fishing for attention. Disapointing.

There is a conversation started by Ajax Andy above.

Are you here to contribute?

[Gash]

There is a conversation started by Ajax Andy above.

Are you here to contribute?

I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.

[brap2]

I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.

Jesus I think I should log out

[AjaxAndy]

I think it was a pun, battered, fishing etc.

Either way Brap's chatting his usual codswallop