Formations to suit the players we have
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:44 pm
Formations to suit the players we have
Been thinking that our weakest position is rb in a back 4, so going to 352 with wing-backs would allow us more flexibility, we could retain in form Mykolenko as a lcb, and we could get another forward into the mix
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2023 10:05 am
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
Looks like a wild experiment. I’d be scared to try that tbh.
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
Dyche seems to field a strong line up in the cups, might be worth an experiment. Or if we get to a position of guaranteed safety in the PL
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 4:33 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
If that formation, I would be more inclined another CB rather than Mykolenko, Godfrey...? Maybe not!
And probably Gana, centre midfield, leaving Doucoure to partner DCL; DCL & Beto might compliment each other: one polished and silky smooth, the other raw and rough around the edges!
Unsure about Danjuma
But a revitalised Dele could be a class operator in the middle
And probably Gana, centre midfield, leaving Doucoure to partner DCL; DCL & Beto might compliment each other: one polished and silky smooth, the other raw and rough around the edges!
Unsure about Danjuma
But a revitalised Dele could be a class operator in the middle
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:44 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
Yeah, just speculating.
It would be unreal to get a 70% back to peak form Dele, wouldn’t it
It would be unreal to get a 70% back to peak form Dele, wouldn’t it
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 7:55 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
That you, Frank?sam of the south wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:44 am Been thinking that our weakest position is rb in a back 4, so going to 352 with wing-backs would allow us more flexibility, we could retain in form Mykolenko as a lcb, and we could get another forward into the mix
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:44 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
Ha, that’s my middle nameBornblue88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:34 pmsam of the south wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:44 am Been thinking that our weakest position is rb in a back 4, so going to 352 with wing-backs would allow us more flexibility, we could retain in form Mykolenko as a lcb, and we could get another forward into the mix
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
That you, Frank?
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
The formation we are using is effective as is. Dyche just needs to rotate his options more.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:44 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
Plus, he was very 343Bornblue88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:34 pmThat you, Frank?sam of the south wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:44 am Been thinking that our weakest position is rb in a back 4, so going to 352 with wing-backs would allow us more flexibility, we could retain in form Mykolenko as a lcb, and we could get another forward into the mix
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
No but he could use them knowing he'll lose some things and gain others
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 4:33 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
I think he would lose more than he would gain, though(?) Heavily reliant on that first XI formation...
January may change that - Godfrey leaving? Dobbin out on loan? Two decent signings in?
January may change that - Godfrey leaving? Dobbin out on loan? Two decent signings in?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 7:55 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
It’s the same formation really. My point is that this is very much like him trying to force the players into a formation they can’t play. Switching to this would completely undo all the things Dyche has achieved since that fantasist Lampard finally got the sack and he’s not going to do it anyway. Back four forever. We’re probably more equipped to play wing backs now we have Young but the squad still doesn’t have anything near the skills mix to play a back 5 successfully. Tark is too slow to play in a 3 and Myko, while he’s had some great performances, is still too poor in the air and positionally to play LCB at this level. Godfrey and Keane are just rubbishsam of the south wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:15 pmPlus, he was very 343Bornblue88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:34 pmThat you, Frank?sam of the south wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:44 am Been thinking that our weakest position is rb in a back 4, so going to 352 with wing-backs would allow us more flexibility, we could retain in form Mykolenko as a lcb, and we could get another forward into the mix
Pickford
Tarkowski Branthwaite Mykolenko
Harrison Garner Doucouré Onana McNeil
DCL Danjuma
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
feels like the formation currently works but Villa in the cup was impressive, was that a 3-5-2-1?
Ideally, Patterson goes to the championship on loan when Coleman is back and we get two wingers who can do what McNeil and Harrison can, get up and down all game.
Ideally, Patterson goes to the championship on loan when Coleman is back and we get two wingers who can do what McNeil and Harrison can, get up and down all game.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:44 pm
Re: Formations to suit the players we have
It’s not the same as 343, which left us dominated in the centre of the pitch.Bornblue88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 1:39 pmIt’s the same formation really. My point is that this is very much like him trying to force the players into a formation they can’t play. Switching to this would completely undo all the things Dyche has achieved since that fantasist Lampard finally got the sack and he’s not going to do it anyway. Back four forever. We’re probably more equipped to play wing backs now we have Young but the squad still doesn’t have anything near the skills mix to play a back 5 successfully. Tark is too slow to play in a 3 and Myko, while he’s had some great performances, is still too poor in the air and positionally to play LCB at this level. Godfrey and Keane are just rubbish
We switched to the 352 v Villa and looked good, so he’s played it before.
Plus, it’s not like our current 4411 has us dominating the ball, or ever really feeling in control of matches, so I thought I’d just start a formations thread to shoot the breeze.